Opposing Views Clash in Columbus Over Gun Bill that Eliminates Permit Requirement
Lawmakers and dozens of opponents to a pro-gun bill squared off in an Ohio House committee over so-called “Constitutional Carry.” The measure allows anyone to carry a concealed weapon without the need for a permit or training.
Amy Whitson is a trauma surgeon who teaches advanced trauma life support in Columbus. She said she’s seen first-hand the serious and fatal effects of gun violence, through the patients she’s tended. “House Bill 178 would permit more people to carry out violent acts such as this,” Whitson said.
The bill would allow permitless concealed carry, scrapping the state requirements for a person to receive eight hours of training and obtain a permit in order to carry a concealed weapon.
Pro-gun groups have said this is an important constitutional issue, to allow someone to carry a concealed weapon without going through additional hurdles such as training.
State Rep. Ron Hood (R-Ashville) is sponsor of the bill. He takes issue with Whitson’s claim that it would mean more violence.
“Can you explain to me or show me how in HB178, how it permits people to carry out violent acts?” Hood asked.
“So, by releasing needing a permit to carry a concealed weapon, more people will be able to carry concealed weapons into buildings and into schools and commit violent acts, it’s a direct line,” Whitson said.
But Hood argued the flaw in that perspective is that someone who wants to carry out a violent act isn’t waiting for the permit laws to change. “Can you explain to me how a criminal is going through that process in their mind that ‘I’m gonna go murder somebody but, oh House Bill 178 didn’t become law so I just can’t, I’m not going to be able to take my gun in there and commit that violent act.’”
Along with permitless concealed carry, the bill would also remove the requirement for an armed person to tell a police officer that they’re carrying a weapon. Law enforcement groups are also opposing the bill because of the changes it makes to the notification requirement.
State Rep. Fred Strahorn (D-Cincinnati) said the general notion with permits and training is to require more responsibility to come with gun ownership, or concealed carry. “This bill makes it somewhat harder for law enforcement to distinguish between who maybe has good intent and who may have bad intent. And a lot of violence happens in a fluid motion, everything’s not premeditated.”
Matthew Youkilis, a recent graduate of Walnut Hills High School in Cincinnati, insists there should be more gun restrictions not less. He shared the story of his cousin Jaime Guttenberg, who was killed in the mass school shooting in Parkland, Florida. And he referenced a statistic from Stanford Law researchers that found states with weaker carry permit laws end up seeing an increase of gun violence by 13-15%.
State Rep. Kyle Koehler (R-xxx), a co-sponsor of the bill, takes issue with the statistics that are brought up when it comes to gun violence, saying that the numbers might include suicides.
“Suicide is horrible. Gun violence is horrible. But to somehow relate it to concealed carry law that doesn’t mean anything in relationship to this particular bill.”
Youkilis disagreed, saying the data is reliable proof. “I think if it’s 15%, that’s a clear causation. That is a major increase in violent crime rates. There’s a clear causation in that scenario.”
Strahorn added that there might be certain scenarios of gun violence that don’t necessarily align directly with the requirement for a permit, but said making Ohio a permitless carry state can strike the wrong tone. “We can do things that encourage people to be more responsible, to seek training, to delay the purchase or perhaps the carrying of a firearm that gives them a moment to think.”
This bill has been introduced several times in the Ohio General Assembly, but may have more momentum this year as more states pass similar laws.