News
News Home
Quick Bites
Exploradio
News Archive
News Channel
Special Features
NPR
nowplaying
On AirNewsClassical
Loading...
  
School Closings
WKSU Support
Funding for WKSU is made possible in part through support from the following businesses and organizations.

Knight Foundation

Meaden & Moore

Akron Children's Hospital


For more information on how your company or organization can support WKSU, download the WKSU Media Kit.

(WKSU Media Kit PDF icon )


Donate Your Vehicle to WKSU

Programs Schedule Make A Pledge Member BenefitsFAQ/HelpContact Us
Crime and Courts


JobsOhio lawsuit is thrown out on grounds of legal standing
Ohio Supreme Court will not rule on constitutionality of the public-private entity at this time
by WKSU's STATEHOUSE BUREAU CHIEF KAREN KASLER


Reporter
Karen Kasler
 
Judith French wrote the majority decision that two lawmakers and a liberal group have no standing to challenge JobOhio's constitutionality.
Courtesy of File photo
Download (WKSU Only)
In The Region:
The Ohio Supreme Court’s decision on JobsOhio does not say anything about whether the legislature’s creation of that public-private entity was constitutional. That question could not be answered until the court decided who had the legal right to ask it.
LISTEN: KASLER ON RULING

Other options:
Windows Media / MP3 Download (3:33)


The court ruled 5-2 that Progress Ohio and two Democratic state lawmakers have no personal stake in the outcome and so cannot challenge the law that created JobsOhio. They had argued that they did have the right to sue for several reasons, one of them being that they're taxpayers.

Jonathan Adler is a professor at Case Western Reserve University School of Law, and he says the court’s decision is the right one.

“If you have broad taxpayer standing or even broader public-rights standing, as has been argued by the plaintiffs here, you basically allow for every political dispute to become a judicial dispute," Adler says. "And that’s corrosive both to our political system and to the judicial process.”

A question of standing
The question of legal standing has come up in several cases, including one before the Ohio Supreme Court that was waiting on this ruling. It is a lawsuit over Gov. John Kasich’s decision to allow video slot machines at horse-racing tracks and was filed by the conservative Ohio Roundtable. David Zanotti is the president.

“We have a great amount of sympathy for the folks at Progress Ohio because standing is a very serious question, and we respect the questions that Progress Ohio is bringing to the table," Zanotti says. "And those questions really have to do with accountability in government, and what happens when one branch exceeds their constitutional authority.”

Who has standing?
The majority justices said their decision does not mean no one has standing, and that there are several people and groups that were identified in the case who could potentially bring a claim against the law. And the justices write that the courthouse doors are open to them. But Zanotti is concerned about how they might determine what defines an injured party in a given challenge to a state law, policy or constitutional issue.

“So the question of standing becomes you have to be uniquely harmed, or concretely harmed, or they add all these adverbs to the nature of harm -- and say that the courts exist to permit standing only to people that have unique, concrete, specific, verifiable, whatever terms in regards to standing," Zanotti says.

But Adler says the decision may not have that long a reach.

“There’s no one who had standing before this decision that’s going to lose it as a result," Adler says. "But on the other hand, various individuals or groups would have had trouble establishing standing before this decision, the decision is not going to help them either.”

Minority Dissent
Justices Paul Pfeifer and William O’Neill broke with the majority, which is not much of a surprise to many court watchers given their pointed questions during the arguments in the case in November.

Pfeifer’s dissent includes some strong words for his colleagues in the majority, and noted that this is the third time the court has been asked about the constitutionality of JobsOhio. Though the majority writes that Pfeifer is incorrect, he says this decision ensures they will not ever answer it. He also writes, “Ohioans will never know whether their government is violating the Constitution. Apparently, they do not deserve to know.”

O’Neill, the only Democrat on the court, writes that hundreds of millions of dollars are being funneled into a dark hole, and “it is simply shameful that the court refused to do its job.”

Add Your Comment
Name:

Location:

E-mail: (not published, only used to contact you about your comment)


Comments:




 
Page Options

Print this page

E-Mail this page / Send mp3

Share on Facebook




Stories with Recent Comments

Columbus groups are trying to pass a Bill of Rights to combat fracking
Its about time we make a stand against the criminal actions of an entire Indsutry.

Crystal Ball says Ohio governor's race is done
How much is the Kasich campaign paying you to keep repeating the phrase "woman who is not his wife"? Fitzgerald was in the car with a friend who happens to be f...

Plane that crashed killing Case students is a popular training aircraft
The following is incorrect. The last few words should read "UNDER maximum gross take-off weight." “They have a normal take-off speed and all those take-off...

Exploradio: The never-ending war against superbugs
Super Federico ,we are so proud of you ,and very lucky to be among your friends . Keep it up human kind needs people like you to survive .Thanks for being so d...

Ohio's Lyme disease-carrying tick population is exploding
Interesting report. The last sentence needs some editing. It isn't a good idea to "save garments carrying ticks for analysis." The garments carrying t...

Teach for America enters third year in Ohio
For more background on TFA, check out http://reconsideringtfa.wordpress.com/

Faith leaders hold week-long prayer vigil at Ohio Statehouse
I think this is the wrong link to the audio. Its Andy Chow about cigarette taxes.

A $30 million plan to turn Cleveland's Public Square from gray to green
The current plan is for the Land Bank, RTA, and Mr. Jeremy Paris to run a bus line through the new Public Square and cutting the park in half. Save Public Squar...

Medina County residents question safety of proposed natural gas pipeline
I'm very concerned about this nexus project. I've received mail requesting my permission to allow the company to survey my property. I don't understand how thi...

A small group of tea party and Democrats protest at Kasich campaign stop
Enjoyed your excellent coverage of the statehouse for sometime now, never dreamed I'd be on. The feedback from people has been great. Thank you. Doris Adams

Copyright © 2014 WKSU Public Radio, All Rights Reserved.

 
In Partnership With:

NPR PRI Kent State University

listen in windows media format listen in realplayer format Car Talk Hosts: Tom & Ray Magliozzi Fresh Air Host: Terry Gross A Service of Kent State University 89.7 WKSU | NPR.Classical.Other smart stuff. NPR Senior Correspondent: Noah Adams Living on Earth Host: Steve Curwood 89.7 WKSU | NPR.Classical.Other smart stuff. A Service of Kent State University