News Home
Quick Bites
News Archive
News Channel
Special Features
On AirNewsClassical
School Closings
WKSU Support
Funding for WKSU is made possible in part through support from the following businesses and organizations.


Akron General

Akron Children's Hospital

For more information on how your company or organization can support WKSU, download the WKSU Media Kit.

(WKSU Media Kit PDF icon )

Donate Your Vehicle to WKSU

Programs Schedule Make A Pledge Member BenefitsFAQ/HelpContact Us
Courts and Crime

JobsOhio lawsuit is thrown out on grounds of legal standing
Ohio Supreme Court will not rule on constitutionality of the public-private entity at this time

Karen Kasler
Judith French wrote the majority decision that two lawmakers and a liberal group have no standing to challenge JobOhio's constitutionality.
Courtesy of File photo
Download (WKSU Only)
In The Region:
The Ohio Supreme Court’s decision on JobsOhio does not say anything about whether the legislature’s creation of that public-private entity was constitutional. That question could not be answered until the court decided who had the legal right to ask it.

Other options:
Windows Media / MP3 Download (3:33)

The court ruled 5-2 that Progress Ohio and two Democratic state lawmakers have no personal stake in the outcome and so cannot challenge the law that created JobsOhio. They had argued that they did have the right to sue for several reasons, one of them being that they're taxpayers.

Jonathan Adler is a professor at Case Western Reserve University School of Law, and he says the court’s decision is the right one.

“If you have broad taxpayer standing or even broader public-rights standing, as has been argued by the plaintiffs here, you basically allow for every political dispute to become a judicial dispute," Adler says. "And that’s corrosive both to our political system and to the judicial process.”

A question of standing
The question of legal standing has come up in several cases, including one before the Ohio Supreme Court that was waiting on this ruling. It is a lawsuit over Gov. John Kasich’s decision to allow video slot machines at horse-racing tracks and was filed by the conservative Ohio Roundtable. David Zanotti is the president.

“We have a great amount of sympathy for the folks at Progress Ohio because standing is a very serious question, and we respect the questions that Progress Ohio is bringing to the table," Zanotti says. "And those questions really have to do with accountability in government, and what happens when one branch exceeds their constitutional authority.”

Who has standing?
The majority justices said their decision does not mean no one has standing, and that there are several people and groups that were identified in the case who could potentially bring a claim against the law. And the justices write that the courthouse doors are open to them. But Zanotti is concerned about how they might determine what defines an injured party in a given challenge to a state law, policy or constitutional issue.

“So the question of standing becomes you have to be uniquely harmed, or concretely harmed, or they add all these adverbs to the nature of harm -- and say that the courts exist to permit standing only to people that have unique, concrete, specific, verifiable, whatever terms in regards to standing," Zanotti says.

But Adler says the decision may not have that long a reach.

“There’s no one who had standing before this decision that’s going to lose it as a result," Adler says. "But on the other hand, various individuals or groups would have had trouble establishing standing before this decision, the decision is not going to help them either.”

Minority Dissent
Justices Paul Pfeifer and William O’Neill broke with the majority, which is not much of a surprise to many court watchers given their pointed questions during the arguments in the case in November.

Pfeifer’s dissent includes some strong words for his colleagues in the majority, and noted that this is the third time the court has been asked about the constitutionality of JobsOhio. Though the majority writes that Pfeifer is incorrect, he says this decision ensures they will not ever answer it. He also writes, “Ohioans will never know whether their government is violating the Constitution. Apparently, they do not deserve to know.”

O’Neill, the only Democrat on the court, writes that hundreds of millions of dollars are being funneled into a dark hole, and “it is simply shameful that the court refused to do its job.”

Add Your Comment


E-mail: (not published, only used to contact you about your comment)


Page Options

Print this page

E-Mail this page / Send mp3

Share on Facebook

Stories with Recent Comments

Backers of legalizing marijuana in Ohio promise to be back in 2016
We should be aloud to grow more than 4 plants and not have to register with the state considering it will be a free market.

Akron says it's had no second thoughts about welcoming refugees
What business does Councilman Neal own on North Hill? I'd love to support him. I am so glad to have the refugees in our neighborhood. I have lived here for 25 ...

Scarborough says the University of Akron is trying to rebuild relationships
In order for the University of Akron to grow and become a desirable place for students across Ohio and elsewhere, it must address the crime problem in the Akron...

Ohio Sen. Cliff Hite wants to end pay-to-play sports fees at Ohio's schools
You can bet Hite and Husted will also rush to the rescue of the Academic Challenge team, the speech-and-debate squad, the Science Olympians and the chess club. ...

Ohio lawmakers consider new gun bills
States that have gun restrictions/cities have reduced gun violence is false. CHICAGO has some of the toughest gun laaws/restrictions but yet fun violence is off...

Cleveland's public transit system considers fare increase for 2016
I work with individuals with disabilities. Yes some of my folks need more help than the average person. As a whole, the group I work with however can manuver ju...

Community group sues to re-open part of Wadsworth hospital
My father was part of the founding group of citizens which started the "new" Wadsworth/Rittman Hospital. For some reason the leadership for the future of the ho...

The Cleveland Museum of Art presents painters who loved their gardens
brilliant masterpiece, Greetings from

Ohio Sen. Tom Patton proposes bill for firefighter cancer benefits
Thank you Senator Patton. On behalf of all of those who love our firefighters; we appreciate that someone is standing up for them and their continued health. ??...

Copyright © 2015 WKSU Public Radio, All Rights Reserved.

In Partnership With:

NPR PRI Kent State University

listen in windows media format listen in realplayer format Car Talk Hosts: Tom & Ray Magliozzi Fresh Air Host: Terry Gross A Service of Kent State University 89.7 WKSU | NPR.Classical.Other smart stuff. NPR Senior Correspondent: Noah Adams Living on Earth Host: Steve Curwood 89.7 WKSU | NPR.Classical.Other smart stuff. A Service of Kent State University