News
News Home
Quick Bites
Exploradio
News Archive
News Channel
Special Features
NPR
nowplaying
On AirNewsClassical
Loading...
  
School Closings
WKSU Support
Funding for WKSU is made possible in part through support from the following businesses and organizations.

Akron General

Area Agency on Aging 10B, Inc.

Northeast Ohio Medical University


For more information on how your company or organization can support WKSU, download the WKSU Media Kit.

(WKSU Media Kit PDF icon )


Donate Your Vehicle to WKSU

Programs Schedule Make A Pledge Member BenefitsFAQ/HelpContact Us
Crime and Courts


Seven minutes changed everything, but what changed Ashford Thompson?
Ohio Supreme Court delves into the question of why Thompson killed a Twinsburg police officer and what counts as mitigation
by WKSU's M.L. SCHULTZE


Web Editor
M.L. Schultze
 
Justice Paul Pfeifer says the courts have long been dealing with questions of whether a troubled or clean past counts as mitigation.
Courtesy of Ohio Supreme Court video
Download (WKSU Only)
In The Region:

From the time Ashford Thompson shot and killed Twinsburg patrol officer Joshua Miktarian nearly six years ago, the question of “why” keeps resurfacing. The newest group to raise that question is the Ohio Supreme Court, which heard arguments today on Thompson' appeal of his death sentence. WKSU' M.L. Schultze says a good part of the justices' extensive questioning focused on why Thompson turned into a killer.

 

LISTEN: A question of motive and mitigation, abbreviated version

Other options:
Windows Media / MP3 Download (1:19)


LISTEN: A question of motive and mitigation

Other options:
Windows Media / MP3 Download (4:07)


Ashford Thompson’s attorney, Rachel Troutman, says nothing before July 13, 2008 suggested the then-23-year-old Thompson would shoot Joshua Miktarian four times in the head, leaving him dead in the road.

“He was a man who was identified as a nurse, a caretaker, somebody who only had a licensed concealed carry so that he could bring his gun with him to do home health care in bad neighborhoods. This was not a man who had been convicted of anything violent. He was deeply religious, and he was young and he was a nurse who had dedicated his life to taking care of others. In seven minutes, his life got out of control, and officer Miktarian was murdered.”

For which Thompson is on death row – something Troutman was arguing he does not deserve.

But the state’s attorney, Richard Kasay, argued alcohol and anger may have played a role, changing the person people thought Thompson was.  And whatever Thompson was before the traffic stop that morning, Kasay noted, he fled it as a cop killer.

“The argument is that this is a law-abiding religious, mild-mannered peaceful nurse. And maybe before that night, he was. But he didn’t act in character when there’s evidence that what was going on in Mr. Thompson’s psyche was not what others perceived him to have.”

Questions of escalation and remorse
The defense attorney,Troutman, suggested what turned Thompson that night was fear when the traffic stop by Miktarian – and Miktarian’s dog in the cruiser -- started to get out of control. Chief Justice Maureen O’Connor challenged her.

“In Ashford Thompson’s mind, he was pulled over for a noise ordinance violation, something that is not an arrestable offense, and all of the sudden he ended up on the hood of a police car and he was handcuffed. And he saw the police officer reaching for what he thought was a gun. He reached for his taser. …”

“Was he resisting arresting arrest.”

“… Absolutely.”

“So the police officer is trying to cuff him and he reaches for his taser.”

“Yes, your honor.”

"… So your client was resisting arrest … Rather than cooperate and sort the whole thing out, he ends of killing the police officer.”

Why not more consideration?
Troutman wasn’t the only one pressed by the justices.

Justice William O’Neill pressed Kasay on why, during his trial, the questions of Thompson’s feelings of duress that night – and of remorse long afterwards – were quickly dismissed.

“It seems to me that the remorse of the defendant is very clear here, and the trial court said, ‘Yeah, well, but he fled the scene so therefore there is no remorse.’ I’m having trouble with that.”

“That was the trial court’s reasoning; Mr. Thompson did express remorse in his unsworn statement. The trial court’s evaluation … that it was entitled to little if any weight was (based on) the fleeing after murdering the officer.”

What mitigates the horrors of a crime?
The facts of the case also raised a much broader philosophical question in the mind of Justice Paul Pfeifer, who as a state lawmaker reintroduced the death penalty to Ohio -- and who has since become an opponent.

Key to getting a death sentence in Ohio is a stage called mitigation, in which judges or jurors weigh whether the life lived before a crime – and other factors – outweigh the horror of the crime itself. To Pfeifer, Thompson’s clean record is somewhat of a conundrum.

“Should it be mitigating that one had a lousy childhood, abusive parents, in-an-out of institutions as a youth. Would that be mitigating? Or would it be more mitigating that one brought up in the same neighborhood stayed out of trouble, served his country, went to church, had a profession?”

 Whatever the answer the court reaches, the justices seemed to share one sentiment throughout the arguments. The case of Ashford Thompson and Joshua Miktarian is tragic.

Listener Comments:

He shot the guy four times in the head. I have never been that drunk or mad, and I have been through it. Shoot a guy once is bad, maybe a mistake, shoot a guy four times in the head and you are a homicidal killer. Something in you isnt right.


Posted by: Dan (Boston) on July 21, 2014 5:07AM
Add Your Comment
Name:

Location:

E-mail: (not published, only used to contact you about your comment)


Comments:




 
Page Options

Print this page

E-Mail this page / Send mp3

Share on Facebook




Stories with Recent Comments

Massive pipeline planned to pump Ohio shale products to Texas
This needs stopped. Ohioans pay the price, putting up with pollution, leaks, explosions, and the top one percent profit from exporting fracked product to China.

National Weather Service confirms three tornado touchdowns yesterday
I was driving back from a party and was caught in the middle of a large thunderstorm. The hail and lightning were a whole light closer than usual, is something ...

Another Indians season opens with Chief Wahoo under scrutiny
The picture you have for Robert rocha is not him. He has long hair. No idea who that guy is in that picture

Portman predicts McDonald's confirmation, but says it won't be easy
I sent the following note to Senator Blumenthal after reading commentary from yesterday's hearing: Senator, You certainly have the right to ask Mr. McDonald que...

First cricket farm in the U.S. opens in Youngstown
I am interested in cricket flour to replace soy flour in a low carbohydrate diet. As soon as you have cricket flour available for the average person, please le...

New process starts digesting sludge in Wooster
Awesome! When do our sewage rates decrease accordingly?

Akron's Chapel Hill Mall in foreclosure
Not a surprise. Between the shoplifting, gangs and violence that goes on up there it is no wonder that no one feels safe to shop at Chapel Hill. They have sca...

Ohio launches investigation into at least one Concept charter school
I worked at Noble Academy Cleveland as admin assistant and enrolment coordinator for 6 years, I know this is so valid and true and can provide staff names and p...

Copyright © 2014 WKSU Public Radio, All Rights Reserved.

 
In Partnership With:

NPR PRI Kent State University

listen in windows media format listen in realplayer format Car Talk Hosts: Tom & Ray Magliozzi Fresh Air Host: Terry Gross A Service of Kent State University 89.7 WKSU | NPR.Classical.Other smart stuff. NPR Senior Correspondent: Noah Adams Living on Earth Host: Steve Curwood 89.7 WKSU | NPR.Classical.Other smart stuff. A Service of Kent State University