News
News Home
Quick Bites
Exploradio
News Archive
News Channel
Special Features
NPR
nowplaying
On AirNewsClassical
Loading...
  
School Closings
WKSU Support
Funding for WKSU is made possible in part through support from the following businesses and organizations.

Knight Foundation

Don Drumm Studios

Meaden & Moore


For more information on how your company or organization can support WKSU, download the WKSU Media Kit.

(WKSU Media Kit PDF icon )


Donate Your Vehicle to WKSU

Programs Schedule Make A Pledge Member BenefitsFAQ/HelpContact Us
Crime and Courts


Coalition fights to keep red-light cameras in Ohio
A group of law enforcement officials is fighting to keep red-light cameras from being banned in Ohio.
by WKSU's ANDY CHOW


Reporter
Andy Chow
 
Sen. Kevin Bacon says standards could be a compromise on red-light cameras.
Courtesy of State of Ohio
Download (WKSU Only)
In The Region:
Communities around the state are waiting to find out what the future holds for traffic cameras. Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are split on the subject; one side wants to ban the devices and the other side wants to regulate their use. Statehouse correspondent Andy Chow talked to a group of law enforcement hoping the cameras get to stay.
LISTEN: Chow on red-light debate

Other options:
Windows Media / MP3 Download (3:35)


Republican state Sen. Kevin Bacon is trying to find a way to avoid an all-out ban on cameras that watch for drivers who run red lights or speed. The Columbus-area legislator says the devices used to catch law-breaking drivers at dangerous intersections are reducing crashes and making areas safer.

The Senate is debating a bill that would prohibit the use of traffic cameras anywhere in the state. Bacon is introducing a measure that avoids a ban and implements a statewide standard instead.

A coalition of law enforcement and safety officials gathered in the Ohio  Statehouse to support Bacon’s effort. That includes Sergeant Brett Bauer, with the Springfield Police Department, who says a ban would send the state in reverse.

“If there’s technology that allows us to reduce these crashes — a technology that’s working — there’s no reason to ban it in our state," Bauer said. "These cameras allow our police departments to deter dangerous driving where red- light running and speeding are most prevalent and we fear that removing them from our streets would lead to more crashes.”

A fundraiser?
Democratic Rep. Dale Mallory is a co-sponsor of the bill to ban the cameras. He says municipalities are abusing the devices to generate revenue. Mallory argued during a speech on the House floor in June that the companies manufacturing and operating these cameras are partially to blame because of their aggressive sales push.

“This bill is a bipartisan effort to protect Ohioans from the overuse of excessive fines," Mallory said. "Camera programs have been repeatedly rejected by both voters and the courts but they continue to be spread throughout the state by companies from out of town with clever names and sales tactics.”

Lt. Brenton Mull with the Columbus Police Department recognizes Mallory’s concerns, but urges lawmakers to find some middle ground on the issue.

“There are some agencies out there that just did not get it right, and I think we should have some kind of reform and I think Sen. Bacon is on the right track. We shouldn’t throw this whole thing out; I think we owe it to the citizens of the state of Ohio to make sure intersections are safe and if we can use technology to do that—I don’t know why we shouldn’t," Mull said.

Not the usual GOP-Dem divide
Democrats and Republicans fall on both sides of the debate. Supporters of the ban say using the cameras lacks due process for drivers hoping to defend themselves and refute the charges.

This is a dilemma that Bacon addresses in his bill. He says these are legitimate concerns but a ban is not the answer.

“It would be,I think, wise to create a statewide standard ...that I think would adequately address those concerns and allow the use of the cameras so we can continue to promote safety at our intersections across the state of Ohio,” Bacon said.

Among the provisions, Bacon says the bill would create a process that gives drivers an opportunity to argue their side of the story. It also contains public information measures to ensure that drivers know where the cameras will be located.

Lt. Mull says knowing where the cameras are helps reduce crashes and make driving safer for everyone.

“This is a force multiplier, and we’re able to change driver behavior and I know every single person in this room —including myself — when I see a cruiser driving down the road, maybe we’ll look down at our speedometer," Mull said. "We’ll hit our turn signal when we make a lane change. These lights that are controlled by photo red lights they, It works, changes your behavior."

The bill to ban traffic cameras has already passed the House. Bacon’s proposal has yet to be formally introduced.

Listener Comments:

The City of Cleveland has 40 cameras,they are not for safety,they're for generating money!! They say it's not that but look at the number this city has! It's unfair to the taxpayer getting gouged already but "big brother" has to have his way!! That's unfair!!!!


Posted by: Antoine (Cleveland) on November 16, 2013 6:11AM
Add Your Comment
Name:

Location:

E-mail: (not published, only used to contact you about your comment)


Comments:




 
Page Options

Print this page

E-Mail this page / Send mp3

Share on Facebook




Stories with Recent Comments

Bridgestone exec indictments are latest step in a billion-dollar price-fixing case
Why is O.P.E.C Not investigated and charges brought against it and it's member companies? It sounds exactly the same...

Ohio's new drilling rules rely on known earthquake faults
requiring drillers to place seismic monitors when they drill within 3 miles of known fault lines. This comment really upsets me!! What good does an instrument t...

Kasich's gubernatorial ad focuses on his blue-collar roots
John Kasich is the biggest con-man in America. He will say one thing and then do the opposite. He is terribly successful at fooling the public and he is worki...

Cab drivers who refuse to drive Gay Games taxis will be replaced
the irony is that most americans distrust or hate muslims much more than they hate gays!! silly ignorant bigots-GO HOME!!!

New transportation companies come to Cleveland
Ride-sharing companies are breaking laws and regulations every day. From regulatory fee evasion to use of smartphone while driving (and even two smartphones(!) ...

Cleveland anti-poverty agency executive resigns amid financial probe
That committee won't be too independent. He plans to stay on until after the new appointee is chosen.

How can you wipe a criminal record clean?
Great article! NO CLINIC in May 2014, however, because it's graduation month for students For the next dates of the FREE Legal Clinic to help with Expungment,...

Drilling remains suspended while ODNR investigates NE Ohio earthquakes
Flaring and lights, so has all been halted? Also, smell of HS2 and sounds of an auger/drilling/water rushing underground. So, has all been halted? In light of t...

Will the Ohio River carry fracking wastewater?
Texas $ vs. WV citizens . Who will our governor listen to?

Copyright © 2014 WKSU Public Radio, All Rights Reserved.

 
In Partnership With:

NPR PRI Kent State University

listen in windows media format listen in realplayer format Car Talk Hosts: Tom & Ray Magliozzi Fresh Air Host: Terry Gross A Service of Kent State University 89.7 WKSU | NPR.Classical.Other smart stuff. NPR Senior Correspondent: Noah Adams Living on Earth Host: Steve Curwood 89.7 WKSU | NPR.Classical.Other smart stuff. A Service of Kent State University