News
News Home
Quick Bites
Exploradio
News Archive
News Channel
Special Features
NPR
nowplaying
On AirNewsClassical
Loading...
  
School Closings
WKSU Support
Funding for WKSU is made possible in part through support from the following businesses and organizations.

Levin Furniture

Hospice of the Western Reserve


For more information on how your company or organization can support WKSU, download the WKSU Media Kit.

(WKSU Media Kit PDF icon )


Donate Your Vehicle to WKSU

Programs Schedule Make A Pledge Member BenefitsFAQ/HelpContact Us
Courts and Crime


Coalition fights to keep red-light cameras in Ohio
A group of law enforcement officials is fighting to keep red-light cameras from being banned in Ohio.
by WKSU's ANDY CHOW


Reporter
Andy Chow
 
Sen. Kevin Bacon says standards could be a compromise on red-light cameras.
Courtesy of State of Ohio
Download (WKSU Only)
In The Region:
Communities around the state are waiting to find out what the future holds for traffic cameras. Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are split on the subject; one side wants to ban the devices and the other side wants to regulate their use. Statehouse correspondent Andy Chow talked to a group of law enforcement hoping the cameras get to stay.
LISTEN: Chow on red-light debate

Other options:
Windows Media / MP3 Download (3:35)


Republican state Sen. Kevin Bacon is trying to find a way to avoid an all-out ban on cameras that watch for drivers who run red lights or speed. The Columbus-area legislator says the devices used to catch law-breaking drivers at dangerous intersections are reducing crashes and making areas safer.

The Senate is debating a bill that would prohibit the use of traffic cameras anywhere in the state. Bacon is introducing a measure that avoids a ban and implements a statewide standard instead.

A coalition of law enforcement and safety officials gathered in the Ohio  Statehouse to support Bacon’s effort. That includes Sergeant Brett Bauer, with the Springfield Police Department, who says a ban would send the state in reverse.

“If there’s technology that allows us to reduce these crashes — a technology that’s working — there’s no reason to ban it in our state," Bauer said. "These cameras allow our police departments to deter dangerous driving where red- light running and speeding are most prevalent and we fear that removing them from our streets would lead to more crashes.”

A fundraiser?
Democratic Rep. Dale Mallory is a co-sponsor of the bill to ban the cameras. He says municipalities are abusing the devices to generate revenue. Mallory argued during a speech on the House floor in June that the companies manufacturing and operating these cameras are partially to blame because of their aggressive sales push.

“This bill is a bipartisan effort to protect Ohioans from the overuse of excessive fines," Mallory said. "Camera programs have been repeatedly rejected by both voters and the courts but they continue to be spread throughout the state by companies from out of town with clever names and sales tactics.”

Lt. Brenton Mull with the Columbus Police Department recognizes Mallory’s concerns, but urges lawmakers to find some middle ground on the issue.

“There are some agencies out there that just did not get it right, and I think we should have some kind of reform and I think Sen. Bacon is on the right track. We shouldn’t throw this whole thing out; I think we owe it to the citizens of the state of Ohio to make sure intersections are safe and if we can use technology to do that—I don’t know why we shouldn’t," Mull said.

Not the usual GOP-Dem divide
Democrats and Republicans fall on both sides of the debate. Supporters of the ban say using the cameras lacks due process for drivers hoping to defend themselves and refute the charges.

This is a dilemma that Bacon addresses in his bill. He says these are legitimate concerns but a ban is not the answer.

“It would be,I think, wise to create a statewide standard ...that I think would adequately address those concerns and allow the use of the cameras so we can continue to promote safety at our intersections across the state of Ohio,” Bacon said.

Among the provisions, Bacon says the bill would create a process that gives drivers an opportunity to argue their side of the story. It also contains public information measures to ensure that drivers know where the cameras will be located.

Lt. Mull says knowing where the cameras are helps reduce crashes and make driving safer for everyone.

“This is a force multiplier, and we’re able to change driver behavior and I know every single person in this room —including myself — when I see a cruiser driving down the road, maybe we’ll look down at our speedometer," Mull said. "We’ll hit our turn signal when we make a lane change. These lights that are controlled by photo red lights they, It works, changes your behavior."

The bill to ban traffic cameras has already passed the House. Bacon’s proposal has yet to be formally introduced.

Listener Comments:

The City of Cleveland has 40 cameras,they are not for safety,they're for generating money!! They say it's not that but look at the number this city has! It's unfair to the taxpayer getting gouged already but "big brother" has to have his way!! That's unfair!!!!


Posted by: Antoine (Cleveland) on November 16, 2013 6:11AM
Add Your Comment
Name:

Location:

E-mail: (not published, only used to contact you about your comment)


Comments:




 
Page Options

Print this page

E-Mail this page / Send mp3

Share on Facebook




Stories with Recent Comments

Cleveland deal ramps up civilian oversight of police
i would like to see police get mandatory psych evals one a year from out side the department.

The generation gap in care for developmentally disabled Ohioans
I don't understand how a few hours a day of caregiving can possibly help a person who lives with complex/multiple disabilities. Many waiver recipients totally d...

Marijuana referendum may change more than pot's legal status in Ohio
If our representatives would act in accordance with the will of the people things like this wouldn't happen. They dragged their feet and blocked discussion on t...

Area pastors and congregation members protest justice system
I live in Cleveland. trust me when I say the high incarceration rate is due to the high crime rate.

Ohio's attorney general rejectsthe latest proposal to legalize marijuana
i think the ag launguage is money hes talking about drug companies must pay him more than responsible ohio can

PBS documentary chronicles the fall of Saigon through new footage and stories
Hi, Does anyone know the number - in the pbs special "Last Days of Vietnam" documentary, of how many Vietnamese were evacuated? Please e-mail me the answer. T...

Protest planned at tomorrow's FirstEnergy meeting
The problems of the poor and downtrodden have nothing to do with First Energy. They are the result of Republican legislators who consistently reduce taxes on th...

Ohio bill would help smaller communities with LGBT discrimination laws
Do we not try and have rights for all individuals equally? On the HUD list of "preferred" candidates who get "special consideration" it states that: For purp...

Ohio likely will continue with two types of police academies
Wake up people your wanting a Harvard law school education for a job that may pay a little over the poverty level. I don't know anyone who could support a wife ...

Police Week's ties from NE Ohio to D.C.
The men and women in blue who risk their lives everyday to serve and protect us....and this is as much recognition and appreciation that NPR/WKSU feels to offer...

Copyright © 2015 WKSU Public Radio, All Rights Reserved.

 
In Partnership With:

NPR PRI Kent State University

listen in windows media format listen in realplayer format Car Talk Hosts: Tom & Ray Magliozzi Fresh Air Host: Terry Gross A Service of Kent State University 89.7 WKSU | NPR.Classical.Other smart stuff. NPR Senior Correspondent: Noah Adams Living on Earth Host: Steve Curwood 89.7 WKSU | NPR.Classical.Other smart stuff. A Service of Kent State University