what is the seatbelt law say, does it just have to be fasten or does it have to be around you. I think it is BULL S--- that we have the gov. acting like they care about you and me. When they will give you a seatbelt ticket while I'm smoking when I'm 1800 times more likely to die from smoking. So they can go to hell acting like they care, they only care when it makes $$$ not us. 42,000 die in cars 38,000 no seatbelt, 400,000 die from smoking this is only in the U.S.. But how many of the 38,000 would a seatbelt helped.

Posted by: Aaron (portsmouth,Ohio) on December 31, 2009 6:04PM

U know not everybody is driving a brand new car that needs full coverage! We have one car with full but the other two have liability. I drive all my cars with care because I can't afford a new one! Don't ever say people don't care with liability!!!! Us real middle class people work hard for what we have and try r best to make it.

Posted by: Monica (Ohio) on September 13, 2009 6:26PM

Please reply to my question to my email address.

I heard that front seat drivers and passengers are required to wear seat belts. is it breaking a law for back seat passengers to not wear seat belts? Do back seat passengers legally have to wear seatbelts.

Posted by: norma (cleveland, ohio) on September 7, 2009 11:21PM

Yes, and soon the government will be attending my cook out to make sure I don't serve hamburgers with too much fat. But it will all be for my own good as well as the good of the collective society as a whole (sacasam indended). Isn't this so wonderful to have a child to parent relationship between us and our government. What is happening to our Liberties?

Posted by: DJ (Mansfield) on August 14, 2009 3:48PM

I agree with the second half of what you said Derek, but I can't say the say about the part where you state that people who only have minimum coverage are the worst drivers. I've never had an accident, but I can only afford minimum coverage because of my economic situation.

Posted by: Jason G (Coshocton) on June 26, 2009 6:05PM

WEARING A SEAT BELT IS MY BUSINESS.
I HAD AN ACCIDENT IN 30 YEARS AGO THAT I WOULD NOT HAVE SURVIVED IF I HAD BE WEARING A SEAT BELT.
THIS DOESN'T CAUSE EVERY ONES INSURANCE TO GO UP!
IT CAUSES ONLY THOSE WHO PAY FULL COVERAGE INSURANCE TO GO UP.
IN OHIO YOU ONLY NEED $12,500 LIABILITY TO BE LEGAL.
THESE PEOPLE WHO HAVE THE MINIMUM COVERAGE ARE USUALLY THE WORST DRIVERS. THEY DON'T PAY MORE IN PREMIUMS ,ONLY THOSE OF US WHO HAVE HIGHER LIABILITY AND FULL COVERAGE PAY MORE.
THE LOW LIMIT ON LIABILITY INS. SHOULD BE RAISED.
$12,500 LIABILITY IS NOT NEAR ENOUGH.
IT IS NOT GOVERNMENTS JOB TO FORCE ME TO WEAR A BELT. THIS IS ANOTHER MONEY GRAB BY GOVERNMENT.
GOVERNMENT SHOULD STAY OUT OF OUR LIVES.
THEY DO NOTHING WELL BUT ROB THE PUBLIC FOR MORE TAXES ,AND THAT IS WHAT THIS IS A TAX. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SAFETY OR THEY WOULD KEEP PEOPLE WHO HAVE THESE YELLOW LICENSE PLATES WITH RED LETTERS OFF THE ROADS. LET THEM TAKE THE BUS. WHY SHOULD I HAVE TO PAY HIGHER RATES TO LET THEM CONTINUE TO DRIVE DRUNK.

Posted by: DEREK ROMAY (TOLEDO) on March 10, 2009 8:48PM